Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150304
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '17 at 18:57
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 157 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 515 47% 395 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled) 571 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 3990) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 71.7 76% 74.9 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 45 47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 49GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6441 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1215 (B1) Unknown 42 42 1230 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 49 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 325655077215	107% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 382 Mixed 414 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 41.9 162% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 114 138% 246 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6446 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1215 (B1) Unknown 98 98 97 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 56 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25130559372	112% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 448 Mixed 499 108% 485 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 44.5 162% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 151 164% 273 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 63GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 73163096 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3609 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 12558006 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6429 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1216 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 521469982 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 57717 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 77309411358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 129252745808576 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11614500069 (F2) Unknown 100 253 145978541397	83.1% Excellent	Read 155 Write 134 Mixed 131 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.21 89% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	105% Outstanding	MC Read 46.1 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 38 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 18.6 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16