Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 3380 31 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 89.2 49% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 261 24% 204 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 14.2 12% 12.7 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 16.4 Splatting 15.1 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 197 189 205 212 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 406 Write 21.2 Mixed 139 SusWrite 195 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 26 87% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 70.1 DQ Mixed 44.8 36% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 124%
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 10GB free Firmware: UE45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 217 Write 165 Mixed 105 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 8.9 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 24.6 DQ Mixed 10.3 11% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 44%
KingFast 30GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 25GB free Firmware: 1.094.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 16 15 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 57% Great: 61%
External Disk 0 250GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 143GB free Firmware: 1.1593 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 96 111 114 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown YXS1866C10D3/8G YXS1866C10D3/8G 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 17.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 11.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	21x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16