| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
| Graphics | 243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 456% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20230518 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 02 '23 at 07:39 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
104%
Outstanding
|
106% 201 Pts
|
130% 1,134 Pts
|
161% 2,603 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750
Asus(1043 88DC) ≥ 4GB; TUF-RTX4070TI-O12G-GAMING
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
243%
Outstanding
|
287% 352 fps
|
259% 334 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3093 3127 3189 2459 1697 1698 MB/s
|
456%
Outstanding
|
657% 2,907 MB/s
|
355% 133 MB/s
|
1,372% 1,827 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
|
163%
Outstanding
|
170% 59.3 GB/s
|
156% 54.7 GB/s
|
49% 81 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 107 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $380Bench 117%, 4,023 samples | 35x |
| Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $298Bench 112%, 4,548 samples | 31x |
| Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $394Bench 116%, 2,844 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples | 12x |
| RTX 4070-TiNvidia $750Bench 240%, 46,082 samples | 10x |
| RX 7900-XTAMD $900Bench 220%, 6,228 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $2,287 |