Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 29 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 103 35% 64.6 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 141 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 5916) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 4.6 4% 3.63 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 5.8 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT23B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 104 105 104 92 112 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16% Very poor	Read 162 Write 90.5 Mixed 111 SusWrite 106 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 2.8 10% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida 1x8GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 260 15% 260 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	14x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	1x

SSD
NT-512 512GBBench 80%, 740 samples	4x
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	3x
512GB SSD 512GBForeseeBench 125%, 1,027 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16