Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 223 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 610 64% 511 Pts	64-Core 783 48% 783 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 35.4 20% 29.3 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 20 20% 25.6 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08351 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 444 Write 79.8 Mixed 71.5 42% 198 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 14.9 79% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 28 36% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 98%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 17GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 62.8 Write 62.4 Mixed 42.3 42% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 PC 8G 2666 1x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.3% Below average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 14.7 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $241

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16