Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 122 55% 88 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 240 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 410M 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908B) 512MB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 382.05 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.6 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
R5SL120G 120GB 596 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 345 340 351 345 271 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 444 Write 355 Mixed 306 SusWrite 332 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 18.8 93% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 30.4 74% 148 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 410MNvidiaBench 1%, 4,608 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
R5SL120G 120GBBench 62%, 596 samples	2x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $69

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16