Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 185% UFO	Desktop 110% UFO	Workstation 160% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$561 858 User benchmarks, average bench 114% AM5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 83.8 1-Core 207 2-Core 380 118% 224 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 816 92% 721 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 119%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$870 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87B0) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 273 Reflection 247 Parallax 276 223% 266 fps	MRender 310 Gravity 233 Splatting 171 187% 238 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$49 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 113 636 418 107 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,712 Write 1,763 Mixed 1,285 SusWrite 310 284% 1,268 MB/s	4K Read 67.2 4K Write 207 4K Mixed 89.9 327% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 924 DQ Write 1,240 DQ Mixed 316 452% 827 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 295%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB 709 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 150 140 150 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 157 Write 147 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 152 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C40 4x16GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	185% Outstanding	MC Read 67.7 MC Write 67.6 MC Mixed 64.6 190% 66.6 GB/s	SC Read 58.1 SC Write 76.2 SC Mixed 56.9 182% 63.7 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 203%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 397%

UFO

Desktop 115%

UFO

Workstation 412%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $340Bench 112%, 1,100 samples	37x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $402Bench 113%, 888 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $379Bench 117%, 923 samples	24x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,595Bench 370%, 13,733 samples	33x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $800Bench 240%, 44,222 samples	21x
RTX 3080Nvidia $870Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	16x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $128Bench 431%, 89,760 samples	18x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWDBench 243%, 34,492 samples	10x

RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 187%, 6,245 samples	20x
F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 186%, 2,116 samples	16x
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 165%, 10,713 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $2,063

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $316	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $396	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16