Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180104
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	May 28 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 127 2-Core 261 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 711 76% 608 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.9% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 79.9 46% 64.8 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 43 45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1930 1965 1954 2057 2073 2060 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	324% Outstanding	Read 2,492 Write 2,203 Mixed 1,504 SusWrite 2,006 460% 2,052 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 65.6 216% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 585 DQ Mixed 859 617% 803 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 324% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 87GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 475 463 456 448 412 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 487 Mixed 440 SusWrite 456 107% 473 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 59.2 194% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 595GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 483 479 478 478 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 484 Mixed 450 SusWrite 479 108% 478 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 53.5 176% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 349 265% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 106 106 106 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 106 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 100%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 128 130 128 130 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 137 Write 143 Mixed 95.6 SusWrite 129 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 97%
WD WD8004FRYZ-0 8TB 837 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 208 208 212 207 206 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 217 Mixed 102 SusWrite 208 137% 187 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 1.6 393% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 138%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 133 127 128 130 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 142 Write 112 Mixed 103 SusWrite 129 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB 17,710 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 34.2 MC Mixed 26.9 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 26.9 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	345x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16