Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3H

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3H (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130318
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 22:12
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2030-$24 18,277 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2030 @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 126 60% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 133 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6157) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 33.9 33% 34 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 34.3 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4786478 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 48859547964126 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1760 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 82 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 29 29 71 (BD) vendor-specific 21 35 34362032149 (C2) HDA temperature 21 35 34362032149 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4786478 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4786478 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4786478 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6363 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6939 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6939 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8621	36.5% Below average	Read 197 Write 129 Mixed 148 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 9.95 65% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 22.7 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 12.2 18% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 73%
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 13GB free Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 808 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1180 (A5) Unknown 100 100 59530 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 29 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 31 210454052895 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 50 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7 (F1) Unknown 100 100 871285733 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3895108857	28.7% Poor	Read 218 Write 159 Mixed 173 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 6.07 32% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 5.86 7% 13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 47%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 471GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 135 133 4241 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4625 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3521 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1597 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 31 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 44543 (C2) HDA temperature 125 108 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.8% Very good	Read 125 Write 125 Mixed 118 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61M-USB3H Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3H

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	25x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	23x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	18x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 2,171 samples	10x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 2x8GBMicronBench 54%, 442 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16