| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150805 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '17 at 20:16 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.6%
Good
|
62% 98 Pts
|
35% 274 Pts
|
20% 329 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1274 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
|
23.5%
Poor
|
23% 29.9 fps
|
25% 30.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
106% 142 MB/s
|
123% 1.25 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
62% 64.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |