Asus X555LB

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus X555LB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X555LB
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150113
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 19:48
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 148 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 211 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A6D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.22% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 10 Parallax 6.72 4% 7.34 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 11.4 7% 8.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.22% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29029 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 514 (B1) Unknown 97 97 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 111 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21512893561	73.6% Very good	Read 489 Write 341 Mixed 345 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 14.4 96% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 15.1 40% 90 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 118%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 253GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 31.1 Mixed 30.8 40% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.29 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB 26,681 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 16.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X555LB Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LB

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	381x
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	284x
Core i3-5010UIntelBench 48%, 11,105 samples	16x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	466x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples	215x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	19x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	77x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 48%, 844 samples	48x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBHynixBench 46%, 1,843 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16