PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 389% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20230309 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '23 at 05:32 |
Run Duration | 266 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-13600K-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
|
133%
Outstanding
|
134% 257 Pts
|
148% 1,220 Pts
|
166% 2,676 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$300
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03
|
142%
Outstanding
|
166% 186 fps
|
124% 157 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$74
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2975 939 932 945 949 938 MB/s
|
389%
Outstanding
|
552% 2,447 MB/s
|
379% 143 MB/s
|
1,611% 2,153 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$74
192GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3237 1463 802 801 811 820 MB/s
|
393%
Outstanding
|
532% 2,360 MB/s
|
357% 133 MB/s
|
1,680% 2,242 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$112
702GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2082 1966 1961 1950 1959 1960 MB/s
|
411%
Outstanding
|
470% 2,079 MB/s
|
354% 129 MB/s
|
1,700% 2,269 MB/s
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 60 | 144 | 34" | 2291 1360 | SNCFFFF EB_E15-34-C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-12600KIntel $200Bench 109%, 57,538 samples | 2,060x |
Core i7-12700KIntel $262Bench 114%, 78,749 samples | 1,611x |
Core i7-12700KFIntel $236Bench 114%, 35,715 samples | 868x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3080Nvidia $856Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 922x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $491Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 748x |
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $530Bench 158%, 166,179 samples | 687x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $1,421 |