Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop 74%
Workstation 26%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 days ago, 10 days ago.
SystemGigabyte H270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 05:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 151
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 242
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 55.4
46% 56.9 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 56.9
48% 58.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3128B-AB1 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 349 153 157 155 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 554
Mixed 659
SusWrite 224
139% 628 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 47
152% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 449
331% 434 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 123%
Great: 173%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 76 79 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44% Average
Read 75.3
Write 89.9
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 77.9
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0B1 Philips 226V4
Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 72%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $468
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback