Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 10 days ago, 3 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189 123,561 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 87.2 1-Core 178 2-Core 353 110% 206 Pts	4-Core 679 8-Core 1,138 111% 909 Pts	64-Core 1,503 93% 1,503 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$300 416,603 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 169 Parallax 154 143% 166 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 126 Splatting 114 111% 140 fps
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB 3,172 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 135 199 107 247 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 909 Write 438 Mixed 253 SusWrite 153 96% 438 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 21.3 107% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 35.4 DQ Mixed 112 83% 114 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 173%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 927GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 170 164 169 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 182 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 156 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 32.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 29.3 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 35.8 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	240	27"	1920 1080	AOC2702 27G2G8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	519x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $165Bench 73%, 446,215 samples	131x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 159,179 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	101x
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	97x
RX 580AMD $185Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $17Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $39Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	44x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	99x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16