Lenovo 82LM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82LM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 46.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 247
75% 145 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 723
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.16
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 25.6
14% 19.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 20.4
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 440 317 370 336 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 893
Write 757
Mixed 721
SusWrite 342
152% 678 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 25
84% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 409
282% 361 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 227%
Generic External 750GB
530GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 37.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 36.8
45% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5ANAG6NCJR-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82LM Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82LM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback