PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B365M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200714 |
Uptime | 16 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '23 at 04:53 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
63.9%
Good
|
68% 113 Pts
|
37% 282 Pts
|
10% 163 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
47% 60.1 fps
|
50% 61.2 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
66.8%
Good
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19% | 42% | 26 | 204 | 46 | 165 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | AOC3202 Q32G2WG3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $150Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,268x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 378x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $230Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 320x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 283x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 257x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 101%, 381,434 samples | 203x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $488 |