Alphasync 1544212

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlphasync 1544212  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550M-K
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:35
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 296
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,024
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 220
Parallax 181
142% 192 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 132
Splatting 113
112% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,561
Write 1,933
Mixed 1618
382% 1,704 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.8
239% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 1,108
833% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
903GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 184 188 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 188
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 190
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 36
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1544212 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1544212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $582
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback