Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:19
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 226
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 604
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$130
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 113
Parallax 69.6
60% 85.4 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 69.6
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$100
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 464
Write 396
Mixed 303
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 46.4
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 172
180% 295 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$60
917GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 402 415 428 423 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 435
Mixed 428
SusWrite 387
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 42.2
144% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 189
154% 227 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 137%
WDC WD6003FFBX-68MU3N0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 234 231 231 238 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 233
Write 228
Mixed 102
SusWrite 225
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 1.5
9% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 4.5
DQ Mixed 3.5
2% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
598GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 103 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 194
Write 186
Mixed 109
SusWrite 103
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 55 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 68.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 55.4
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23" 1920 1080 AOC2343 2343
Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $704
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback