Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 04:19
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 809
72% 608 Pts
64-Core 1,819
113% 1,819 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Dell(1028 3796) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.7% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 85.6
65% 83 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 67.8
66% 83.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 76%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12989
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 381 412 410 406 340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 445
Write 434
Mixed 401
SusWrite 394
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 28.5
104% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 230
177% 236 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 95%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$21
5GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 49 47 47 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 41.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 46.9
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
140GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Read 36.2
Write 38.6
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 4.5
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB
66GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 38.7
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 36.4
50% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.93 MB/s
WD easystore 2647 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 52
Write 34.9
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 36.9
49% 38 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1296 759 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical string Builds (Compare 9,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback