PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | INTEL X99 |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20211221 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '23 at 04:19 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
78.6%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
72% 608 Pts
|
113% 1,819 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Dell(1028 3796) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
65.7%
Good
|
65% 83 fps
|
66% 83.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Fanxiang S101 512GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12989
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 381 412 410 406 340 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
94% 418 MB/s
|
104% 36 MB/s
|
177% 236 MB/s
|
![]() WD Green 500GB (2009)-$21
5GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 49 47 47 45 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
29% 38.8 MB/s
|
106% 0.83 MB/s
|
|
![]() TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
140GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.6 MB/s
|
7.7%
Terrible
|
34% 26.7 MB/s
|
28% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() |
19%
Very poor
|
50% 38.4 MB/s
|
68% 0.93 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD easystore 2647 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
49% 38 MB/s
|
100% 1.33 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
40%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
51% 78.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 72.3" | 1296 759 | GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 818x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 72%, 2,179 samples | 701x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 2,496 samples | 566x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $146Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 388x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 379x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 318x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $163 |