PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150918 |
Uptime | 3.6 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '23 at 03:41 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
67.6%
Good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
36% 273 Pts
|
18% 289 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$146
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
|
32%
Below average
|
34% 40.2 fps
|
28% 35.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 145 132 137 140 138 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
74% 329 MB/s
|
127% 42.3 MB/s
|
241% 324 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$36
627GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 125 123 124 124 MB/s
|
71.3%
Very good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
180% 1.23 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.3%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
60% 67.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 3 | 210 | 55 | 165 | 27" | 1920 1080 | GBT270A G27FC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 296x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $95Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 151x |
Core i7-4790Intel $150Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 55x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 93x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 61x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 52x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $893 |