Asrock Q77M vPro

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q77M vPro (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 19:22
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 193 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 395 50% 381 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gainward(10B0 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 161 Parallax 154 117% 153 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 144 Splatting 114 102% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14960 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1682 (B1) Unknown 96 96 80 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 118 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31036506081	96.4% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 409 Mixed 169 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 38.4 134% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 103 108% 178 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 34359738368 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 137440395291 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	104% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 179 Mixed 88.1 111% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.2 104% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 440GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 168 1983 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1121 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10398 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1053 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 69 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8196 (C2) HDA temperature 118 98 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	94.4% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 156 Mixed 114 110% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.33 104% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q77M vPro Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Q77M vPro

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	24x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	11x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	10x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	4x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 49%, 3 samples	3x
KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GBKingstonBench 52%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16