MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 02:23
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 172
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 632
57% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,835
114% 1,835 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Nvidia(10DE 17FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 260
Parallax 316
219% 282 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 242
Splatting 188
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 192%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 1724 1707 1739 1740 1762 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 2,093
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 1,744
417% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 50.4
162% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 485
344% 444 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 264%
Great: 425%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$44
132GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 241 218 202 222 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 491
Write 446
Mixed 307
SusWrite 256
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 35.7
124% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 251
207% 296 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 101%
Toshiba HG6 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 447 447 446 447 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 453
Mixed 436
SusWrite 445
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 36.2
117% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 332
247% 328 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98%
Great: 104%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1.5TB
528GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 70 69 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 67
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 69.1
74% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
489GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 124 124 124 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 94.9
Write 104
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 123
133% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.7
356% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.9
393% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $996
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback