Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO S

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO S (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 76.6 1-Core 132 2-Core 255 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 801 79% 645 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% EVGA(3842 1068) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.2% Very good	Lighting 90.6 Reflection 89.7 Parallax 83.3 74% 87.9 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 71.2 69% 86.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB 14,867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0311A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 39 36 42 42 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 464 Write 428 Mixed 93 SusWrite 61 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 0.8 96% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 0.9 36% 85 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$48 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 106 104 104 104 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 121 Write 141 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 104 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB 891 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 28.9 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 22.6 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	60	165	27"	1536 864	MSI3CA7 MSI G273

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO S Builds (Compare 760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	140x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 159,179 samples	129x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $122Bench 88%, 10,823 samples	63x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 101%, 381,434 samples	67x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	49x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $300Bench 128%, 416,603 samples	39x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $50Bench 260%, 140,876 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $50Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	16x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 218%, 20,069 samples	14x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	26x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $419

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16