Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 02:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 190 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 576 55% 455 Pts	64-Core 719 44% 719 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.2% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 60.7 46% 62 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 60 Splatting 55.4 49% 61 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$199 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 44 56 122 165 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 510 Write 25.6 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 80.1 35% 165 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 20.4 83% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 52.7 65% 120 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$65 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 596GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 191 190 189 190 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 108 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 190 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.5 424% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD 2x8GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 22.3 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 25: 0P 4R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	31%	29	218	60	60	27"	1920 1080	PLN2710 PX2710MW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $391Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	388x
Core i7-6800KIntel $170Bench 81%, 38,324 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $160Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	66x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $55Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	8x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR 4x8GBCrucialBench 104%, 418 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $1,295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16