| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-CS (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190703 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '23 at 00:59 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
40% 314 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$146
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 532.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.7%
Poor
|
24% 38.3 fps
|
27% 33.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24% 107 MB/s
|
42% 13.6 MB/s
|
84% 103 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
583GB free
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
|
18% 81.9 MB/s
|
40% 12.4 MB/s
|
10% 12.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.8%
Very good
|
80% 27.8 GB/s
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
52% 77 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 9% | 11 | 208 | 59 | 144 | 24.1" | 1536 864 | SAM0F90 LC24RG50 |
Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 695 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $191Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 191x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $85Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 115x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 77x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $146Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 108x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 91x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 77x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $354 |