Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	PC Intel Home Office II (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200331
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 255 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 814 78% 645 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 3571) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 120 Reflection 105 Parallax 97.7 98% 107 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 73.1 74% 94.4 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
512gb PCS 2.5" SSD 512GB 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1031B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 5 189 361 310 6.5 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 257 Write 194 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 146 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 72 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 3 DQ Mixed 0.2 17% 44 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 96%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 31GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 45 65 56 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 108 Mixed 106 SusWrite 38.8 54% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.5 152% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 693GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 133 130 135 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 144 Write 137 Mixed 20 SusWrite 133 141% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666Z16K4 2x8GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 23.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 53%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	27x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	26x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	25x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	58x
CM4X16GE2400Z16K4 1x16GBCorsairBench 44%, 661 samples	32x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 959 samples	21x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $335

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16