Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 57.6 2-Core 134 49% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 193 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 532.03 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 46.5 Parallax 37.6 28% 39.6 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 25.6 26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 80 31 125 21 29 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.3% Very poor	Read 90.9 Write 93.4 Mixed 80.1 SusWrite 75 19% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 8.9 34% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 100%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 583GB free Firmware: SBFKZ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 340 362 382 379 380 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 295 Write 349 Mixed 287 SusWrite 360 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 27.5 96% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 180 151% 214 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB 58,684 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 17.3 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 15.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	245x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16