MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Gaming 64%
Desktop 76%
Workstation 62%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 23:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 675
63% 525 Pts
64-Core 972
60% 972 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 122
Parallax 176
87% 135 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 125
Splatting 84.4
83% 104 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 113 21 45 22 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 448
Write 333
Mixed 342
SusWrite 91.7
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 19.3
79% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 39.1
64% 123 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 99%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
18GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 86 87 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 86.1
113% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 KD4AGUA80-40B190B 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 26.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $973
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback