Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211126
Uptime	26 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 96,815 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 107 49% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 231 26% 205 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 177F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 30 Parallax 3.2 2% 12.1 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.7 3% 4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 23,567 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 797 873 812 732 713 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,252 Write 986 Mixed 844 SusWrite 783 216% 966 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 46 151% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 255 210% 303 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 254%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 931GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 115 119 114 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 167 Write 30.5 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 114 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 13 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	189	55	144	15.5"	1296 759	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 4,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 70%, 96,815 samples	3,780x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	236x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	67x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	2,490x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	1,593x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 200%, 23,567 samples	3,338x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TBBench 219%, 6,851 samples	182x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 207%, 11,835 samples	112x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	1,336x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	870x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	339x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $27
Intel Core i5-12600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16