Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211027
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$275 61,928 User benchmarks, average bench 101% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 91.2 1-Core 164 2-Core 322 104% 193 Pts	4-Core 605 8-Core 1,136 104% 871 Pts	64-Core 1,566 97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$130 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 89.6 Parallax 54.9 53% 69.7 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 66.7 55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 206,100 User benchmarks, average bench 386% 521GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1790 1727 1541 1545 1571 1598 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 2,317 Write 2,240 Mixed 2,175 SusWrite 1,629 470% 2,090 MB/s	4K Read 63 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 78.5 262% 88.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,320 DQ Write 1,136 DQ Mixed 1,231 922% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 251% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 478%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 64GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2133, 2667, 2133, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 35.8 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.3 SC Write 42.2 SC Mixed 32.1 97% 33.9 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	58	75	23.9"	1920 1009	SAM707D LF24T35

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $130Bench 94%, 38,461 samples	402x
Core i5-11400Intel $133Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	264x
Core i7-11700KIntel $275Bench 101%, 61,928 samples	226x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $290Bench 100%, 301,333 samples	309x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $300Bench 129%, 386,775 samples	205x
RTX 3070Nvidia $491Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	107x

SSD
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	72x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $30Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $40Bench 226%, 56,204 samples	65x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 36,835 samples	159x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	89x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 92%, 24,939 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $27
Intel Core i5-12600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16