Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 18:43
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 739
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 30.9
30% 31.1 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 31.2
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 445
Write 125
Mixed 191
55% 254 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 14.1
125% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 14
30% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 80%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
65GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 482
Write 404
Mixed 240
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 4.37
70% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 6
19% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
200GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82
Write 80.8
Mixed 80.3
61% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.27
105% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
155GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 140
Mixed 130
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.28
102% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
159GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 72.9
123% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.14
74% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback