PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190124 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '23 at 20:46 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i9-9900K-$638
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
80% 139 Pts
|
69% 569 Pts
|
69% 1,111 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$146
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
28% 36.9 fps
|
26% 32.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 265 53 74 76 56 MB/s
|
129%
Outstanding
|
177% 798 MB/s
|
169% 56 MB/s
|
204% 327 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 163 164 164 165 MB/s
|
93.2%
Outstanding
|
97% 132 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
87% 30.3 GB/s
|
64% 22.3 GB/s
|
65% 61.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 200 | 27" | 1280 720 | WAM3000 UG30 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $350Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 4,058x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $230Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 2,374x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $638Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,077x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,528x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 871x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $491Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 810x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $1,179 |