Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 days ago, 9 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 20:28
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$309 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 103 2-Core 218 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 634 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C758) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.4% Good	Lighting 75.4 Reflection 81.9 Parallax 69 61% 75.4 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 75.3 Splatting 66.8 64% 80.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$55 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 47 66 38 50 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44% Average	Read 413 Write 132 Mixed 278 SusWrite 51.5 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 17 59% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 34.6 54% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 267GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 127 134 133 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 124 Write 109 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 130 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 26.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 24.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	144	23.8"	1280 720	AUS2421 ASUS VG249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $309Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	877x
Core i5-6400Intel $170Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	59x
Core i5-6500Intel $138Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	439x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $146Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	52x
RTX 3060Nvidia $290Bench 100%, 301,333 samples	50x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $55Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	299x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $118Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	43x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	29x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	545x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	71x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $483

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $27
Intel Core i5-12600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16