Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 77 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 175 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 297 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Husky 128GB 128GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2202XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 60 19 40 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 402 Write 361 Mixed 18 SusWrite 45.6 45% 207 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 0.4 46% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.5 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 0.4 13% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 442GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 174 172 173 175 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 174 Mixed 75 SusWrite 173 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	56x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16