Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 15:07
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$246 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 391 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 194 Parallax 119 114% 151 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 129 Splatting 114 112% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 43 43 43 44 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 428 Write 408 Mixed 269 SusWrite 71 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 41.9 139% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 309 238% 325 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$118 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 254GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 333 375 392 450 457 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 391 Mixed 380 SusWrite 387 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 46 148% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 324 245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 21.2 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 18.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	58	144	24"	1920 1080	ACR041B Acer XB240H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $170Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	134x
Core i5-6500Intel $138Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	109x
Core i3-6100Intel $125Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $146Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	78x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $17Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	14x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16