Colorful H310M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 days ago, 11 days ago.

System	Colorful H310M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful H310M-E
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210720
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 08:45
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$125 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 160 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 269 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 53.3 47% 56.4 fps	MRender 64.3 Gravity 51 Splatting 46.9 43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$68 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 750GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 385 397 471 479 471 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 454 Mixed 406 SusWrite 412 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 44.4 151% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 351 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$67 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 316GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 108 109 111 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 188 Write 159 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 109 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905665-014.A00G 99U5713-002.A00G 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.6% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 17.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	144	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2402 24G2W1G3-

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Colorful H310M-E

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $144Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	3x
Core i3-6100Intel $125Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	2x
Core i7-9700Intel $308Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $110Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
256GB 256GBRX7Bench 63%, 50 samples	2x
120GB SSD 120GB3Bench 60%, 3,381 samples	1x
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $53Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	1x

RAM
D4H4GL26A8TS5 2x4GBUnknownBench 82%, 42 samples	3x
Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $171Bench 74%, 14,163 samples	1x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 14,529 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $254

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16