Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 08:24
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 54.2
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 195
60% 112 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 633
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 972
60% 972 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 159C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 15.8
11% 22 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2395
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,704
472% 2,122 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 51.9
158% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 667
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 603
444% 586 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Transcend JM3200HSG-8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 28
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback