Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$330 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	63% Good	Memory 53.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 197 64% 118 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 609 62% 499 Pts	64-Core 799 49% 799 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 174 180 186 185 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 379 Write 361 Mixed 285 SusWrite 184 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 30.5 97% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 298 225% 302 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 155 147 150 153 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 188 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 153 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 1.8 3.6 4.2 3.6 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 51.3 Write 7 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 3.7 13% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 1x16GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	19	6	64	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $330Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	80x
Core i5-8400Intel $172Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	71x
Core i5-9400FIntel $150Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $17Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $39Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	14x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300	Nvidia RTX 3060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16