Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 07:32
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 216
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 766
72% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$325
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 121
Parallax 114
90% 115 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 118
Splatting 80.9
77% 95.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 133%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,384
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,568
449% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 66.1
215% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 804
584% 766 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
79GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 117 118 118 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 163
Write 145
Mixed 146
SusWrite 117
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 28.4
116% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 146
113% 155 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
92GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 419 350 335 418 352 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 475
Mixed 400
SusWrite 389
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 52.7
172% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 30.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1920 1080 IVM610E PL2481H
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 3,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $958
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback