Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+ (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration	91 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 128 50% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 220 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% MSI(1462 3411) CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Lighting 63.9 Reflection 64 Parallax 75 52% 67.6 fps	MRender 61.7 Gravity 56.6 Splatting 51.7 46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 8 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 153692518	57.1% Above average	Read 234 Write 223 Mixed 229 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 23.7 105% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 23.2 27% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 2x8GB 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.2% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	7x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	3x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	2x
SSD 128GBIntensoBench 63%, 1,375 samples	2x

RAM
CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 Kingston 9905584-003.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 6 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.M8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 41 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $84

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16