Intel_ DZ75SL__

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemINTEL_ DZ75SL__
MotherboardIntel_ DZ75SL__  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 18:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$189
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.1% Good
1-Core 101
2-Core 181
68% 141 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 515
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 523
35% 523 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Device(1545 7870) 2GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 106
Reflection 83.1
Parallax 137
29% 109 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 88.4
Splatting 86.4
24% 76.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 512
Write 245
Mixed 298
77% 352 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 10.9
65% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 9.94
33% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
Patriot Memory 64GB
45GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Read 33
Write 19.7
Mixed 18.2
28% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.15
4K Mixed 0.02
7% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback