iEi SEN2

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	iEi SEN2 (all builds)
Motherboard	iEi SAE1
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '17 at 00:27
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% ¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 14 2-Core 22.8 20% 26.2 Pts	4-Core 39.4 8-Core 49.6 6% 44.5 Pts	64-Core 40.2 2% 40.2 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 2.53 1% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME4 128GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: L17606 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 0 0 0 (02) Throughput performance 0 0 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 0 0 0 (08) Seek timer performance 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 8 (0A) Spinup retry count 0 0 0 (0C) Power cycle count 20 0 20 (A3) Unknown 0 0 8 (A8) Unknown 0 0 0 (A9) Unknown 100 0 100 (AF) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 0 0 4 (C2) HDA temperature 39 100 3474631098408 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 0 0 0 (F0) Head flying hours 0 0 0 (A5) Unknown 3 100 3 (A7) Unknown 0 100 2 (AA) Unknown 100 100 144 (AB) Unknown 0 100 0 (AC) Unknown 0 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B8) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 0 (E5) Unknown 100 100 89569723955864 (E8) Unknown 0 0 0 (EB) Unknown 0 0 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9474 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6307	46.5% Average	Read 369 Write 100 Mixed 174 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 17.3 75% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 66.7 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 32.2 33% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 136 Write 60.7 Mixed 85 108% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.98 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.51 109% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown i-DIMM 1x8GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

iEi SEN2

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)