Asrock B760M PG Riptide

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock B760M PG Riptide  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M PG Riptide
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 20:08
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$310
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 214
2-Core 426
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 858
8-Core 1,558
145% 1,208 Pts
64-Core 2,213
137% 2,213 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 18.1
15% 17.8 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 19
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,671
Write 2416
Mixed 1,850
514% 2,312 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 99.3
346% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,774
DQ Write 1,504
DQ Mixed 1,626
1,222% 1,635 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
59GB free
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 282
Mixed 289
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 12.2
57% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 42.4
47% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
935GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 140
Mixed 67
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
205GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 99.7
Mixed 72.2
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: 0708
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.4
Write 123
Mixed 85.5
61% 81 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
205% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6.2
Write 4
Mixed 4.3
6% 4.83 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 51.2
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 27.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 137%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B760M PG Riptide Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M PG Riptide

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback