| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A2 |
| Memory | 120.5 GB free of 127.996 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160726 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 04 '17 at 07:48 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
62%
Good
|
64% 120 Pts
|
60% 498 Pts
|
129% 2,082 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
94.3%
Outstanding
|
95% 126 fps
|
92% 114 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron_1100_MTFD 512GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A020 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
106% 474 MB/s
|
112% 40.8 MB/s
|
109% 218 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.6%
Good
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
28% 141 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |