Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 19:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 201
62% 118 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 522
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 137
Parallax 4.7
4% 49 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.5
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BTW 1TB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 331 389 338 268 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 795
Write 744
Mixed 763
SusWrite 327
148% 657 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 35.2
144% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 588
438% 582 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback