Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2V
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 15:14
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 258 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 619 65% 523 Pts	64-Core 680 42% 680 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 98.4 58% 80.3 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 58.9 54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 53GB free Firmware: DXT07B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 170 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 211 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 903345016	54.2% Above average	Read 514 Write 128 Mixed 174 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 5.95 72% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 43.9 DQ Mixed 5.19 37% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 73%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2173 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 569 (B1) Unknown 81 81 94 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12442306527	70.5% Very good	Read 491 Write 272 Mixed 274 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 16.2 110% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42.3 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 16 23% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$32 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 333GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 75 63 38270577 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 607 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 7542985 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2157 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 560 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 538509344 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 609 (C2) HDA temperature 32 15 64424509472 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 38270577 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 120765890431082 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3714431278 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4559457107	95.8% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 158 Mixed 129 115% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.25 93% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 113%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 535GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 85.6 Write 74.3 Mixed 86.8 105% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.8 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 23.1 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	69x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	61x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	54x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	50x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	40x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	36x

SSD
K5-240G 240GBFaspeedBench 62%, 248 samples	12x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 3,078 samples	15x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	14x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16