Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 14:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 649
72% 565 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$227
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 109
Parallax 112
93% 112 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 94.2
88% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 329 332 357 345 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 368
Write 243
Mixed 224
SusWrite 334
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 17.2
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 214
160% 212 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 228%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
757GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 166
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 156
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback