Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 22:08
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 801 77% 634 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2511 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 166 Parallax 141 134% 157 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 156 Splatting 121 108% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 79GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1411 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 660 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 83 51 17 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5024697585	98.2% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 411 Mixed 425 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 27.6 155% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 45.9 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 27.5 62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 131%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 31GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3545995 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 51041391347959 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1188 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 288 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 16 43 21477654544 (C2) HDA temperature 16 43 21477654544 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3545995 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3545995 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3545995 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1045 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1186 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1186 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2201 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2359321	61.3% Good	Read 513 Write 100 Mixed 153 55% 256 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 12.4 111% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 8.72 25% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2808 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1462 (B1) Unknown 97 97 57 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 48 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 163 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22194132013	94.6% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 416 Mixed 422 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 26.8 154% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 45.7 DQ Write 98.7 DQ Mixed 26.1 33% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 659GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 65 215101973 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 154 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2916453 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 365 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 154 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 62 369819670 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 154 (C2) HDA temperature 22 7 30064771094 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 215101973 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -137267154779796 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1623811874 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1163315464	97.3% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 173 Mixed 155 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.31 109% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 186GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 20 (03) Spinup time 105 100 7716 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5525 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15662 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5492 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 690 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 145202 (C2) HDA temperature 125 94 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.4% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 86.4 Mixed 75.1 65% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 57%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 131GB free Firmware: ZM100-34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6144 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14886 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8873 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7704 (BE) vendor-specific 175 73 21 (C2) HDA temperature 175 73 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8748 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.2% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 56.5 Mixed 52 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.43 95% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 38.2 117% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 23.5 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 60.1 66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $620

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16