Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 17:07
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 97.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 195 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 506 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 149 Parallax 125 104% 134 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 129 Splatting 108 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1147 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 210 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C2) HDA temperature 66 58 180390133794 (F1) Unknown 100 100 55447	41.2% Average	Read 235 Write 166 Mixed 153 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 8.24 70% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 10.6 17% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 94GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 19 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 70 8795 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7464 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 29537 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4133 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 32 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 48 223339479082 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 90 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7529	76% Very good	Read 123 Write 141 Mixed 128 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.47 119% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 37GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 74 74 8590 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 4839 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 37072 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4809 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1062 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 48 690290729 (C2) HDA temperature 57 46 723845163 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 105062 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 22 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	50.2% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 85.8 Mixed 88.4 66% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.39 109% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 8GB free Firmware: 3.01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 48 39 134657433 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13728 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 132 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 992401471 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44869 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10831 (C2) HDA temperature 50 61 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 39 134657433 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 137736 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.5% Poor	Read 47.8 Write 41 Mixed 46.4 34% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 34%
Samsung HA320KJ 320GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 7GB free Firmware: CV300-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8640 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8344 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24568 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4377 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 238987 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 131072 (BC) Unknown 100 100 19 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 41 (C2) HDA temperature 112 91 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 238987 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 99 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	37.7% Below average	Read 72.4 Write 58.9 Mixed 64.7 49% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.33 82% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 22.6 60% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 15.2 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 49.5 81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	283x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	26x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	79x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	67x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16