Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '23 at 19:44
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 227 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 616 63% 509 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1A81) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 42.9 39% 52.9 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 49 Splatting 47.6 38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 371 365 372 373 372 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 904 Write 682 Mixed 419 SusWrite 384 133% 597 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 35.3 132% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 510 DQ Write 505 DQ Mixed 423 341% 479 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 141 135 136 140 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 81.8 Write 116 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 137 69% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 10.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	387x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	179x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	107x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	459x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	272x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	299x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	156x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	206x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	113x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 928 samples	67x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16